Page 53 - ArchDC_Fall 2020
P. 53

Shared kitchen and living space in an upper-level unit.                    Photo © Thomas Holdsworth





























           Photo ©     Living space with preserved architectural elements of the original church.  Photo © Thomas Holdsworth
   Thomas Holdsworth
                       four levels (three above-grade floors plus a cellar level).   The design’s new load-bearing elements became
                       Each co-living unit is effectively a large apartment or   the defining walls of the units’ service spaces. “The
                       group house, with six private bedrooms plus shared   draftiness of the old structure was then eliminated
                       spaces. (On the top floor, one of the co-living units has   with thermally improved exterior walls, low-E
                       four bedrooms rather than six, so as to free up space   [low-solar-emissivity] glazing, and significant roof
                       for an outdoor deck.) The church’s tower was converted   insulation” to meet current energy-efficiency standards.
                       into the building’s new stairway, and a new, accessible   StudioMB “worked to restore the structure’s
                       entry was created at the tower’s base.          damaged shell, as well as significant interior and
                          “The project balances a desire to retain significant   exterior ornamentation, creating a tension between old
                       architectural features with the need to introduce   and new details,” the firm said. “The result is a striking
                       residential uses into a monumentally scaled assembly   balance further reinforced by the exterior’s light and
                       space,” the firm said. “This required reconfiguration   dark palette, which helps differentiate the new slotted
                       and structural repairs of damage suffered during the   windows and roof additions from the heavy masonry
                       2011 earthquake, as well as the insertion of two new   of the original structure.”
                       floors, including a new uppermost level, into what   The jurors deemed the building to be an exemplary
                       had been the exposed rafters of the assembly space. To   adaptive reuse project with “clarity about what was
                       accomplish this, the roof ridge and primary structural   new and what was existing,” noting that there were
                       elements were temporarily shored in place while   several church conversions in the submittals, of which
                       existing balconies and structure were removed.”  this one was exceptional in their opinion.



                                                                               APARTMENT HUNTING                  51
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58