Page 30 - Spring_2019
P. 30

ArchDC Spring 2019.qxp_Spring 2019  2/20/19  5:15 PM  Page 28





































































        Seating area next to the kitchen.



        assets of the property, a shaded rear yard downhill of the  would resolve the view issue while providing better use
        street level, was blocked from view by the addition’s walls.   of space within the house.
                 Early in the design process, Tokunaga proposed          The clients, both of whom had attended the Rhode
        demolition and replacement of the addition. Put simply,  Island School of Design, trusted Tokunaga’s conceptual
        she would retain the original house, and add a minimal-  ideas from the beginning. “They very immediately had a
        ist, modern box that would supplant and expand upon  great understanding of space, materials, and how things
        the prior addition. In her vision, vertical bands of glazing  went together,” she said. “When they came to me, they
        in the back half of the house would admit more light  knew they wanted more light, and they wanted that
        while creating continuity between upstairs and down-  connection between the back yard and the main level.”
        stairs. This straightforward but strategic intervention,          In the prior arrangement, the house’s entry opened
        combined with a new programmatic configuration,  to a living room, but beyond it was a warren of smaller

           28                     NOT-SO-BUNGALOW
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35